Bias investigation
Bill and Ben here decided to try to intimidate me by visiting my home, fully armoured and armed, out numbering me by 100%, with both age and health on their side, yet apparently, they found a sick ( I had been in bed for 3 days, with what was probably COVID-19), middle aged male suffering from a torn rotator cuff and arthritis, bare footed and his pyjamas….
… Intimidating
These two galoots openly admitted that they had conducted an investigation into alleged harassment.
And yet no-one had spoken to me. Making the investigation fall considerably short of the “impartial investigation” required by law, and therefore any actions based on it would be unlawful.
These officers were at my door with one purpose, to …
“warn me.”
When I asked for the opportunity to give my version of the incident, I was told I could not give it to them, as, according to PC Jenman “it would be a conflict of interest“
….. TO WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN AN IMPARTIAL INVESTIGATION!
PC Bell then proceeded to issue me a penal order, something that only a judge can make and it impeded my civil rights, making it unlawful on a second count.
Assualt
The officers were very frustrated with me, as I repeatedly exercised my right to express my opinion. At one point PC Bell suddenly stepped forward and dropped his arm from in front of him, down towards his weapons belt. Both my wife and I feared immediate physical violence.
Protection from Harassment Act 1997
Harassment actually comes in different forms, I was not aware of this before.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/section/2
There is “Harassment”, then there is the “Offence of stalking“, a more serious offence than harassment. Next on the scale of seriousness is “Putting people in fear of violence” and finally, there is “Stalking involving fear of violence or serious alarm or distress“
The maximum punishments for these offences vary too. They are respectively:
- 6 months
- 51 weeks
- Ten years
- Ten years
However, for the offence of harassment, or any of its variants, to be a criminal offence, the “course of conduct” needs to occur “on at least two occasions”
I currently have:
- Over 20 instances that amount to harassment. Individually, they may appear insignificant, but as a collective, they demonstrate a very clear course of action that would lead to harassment.
- At least 3 for stalking.
- 2 for “Putting people in fear of violence”, which put together with the other instances, makes that conduct qualify for “Stalking involving fear of violence or serious alarm or distress“
Why would anyone risk a 10-year prison sentence just to bully someone who pointed out they had parked inconsiderately? If these charges are confirmed, what woul dhappen the the suspects family? Their children? Their business? Some people have so much to loose but act as if they are untouchable.
As a very brief demonstration to show I’m not bluffing, I shall provide a quick overview of a few, of the main points.
The video on the homepage is a major piece of evidence.
At timestamp 0:29, I can be heard saying “Please leave me alone.” Obviously, any action that is not “leaving me alone” will be a course of action the perpetrator will know, would amount to harassment.
This will be the first occasion of harassment.
At time stamp 0:32 I am assaulted, whilst being harassed. This is the first occurrence of “putting people in fear of violence” and caught on video, making it somewhat irrefutable.
At time stamp 2:00 Ms Morgan can be seen changing direction in order to continue following me. By this time, I have already asked Ms Morgan to stop following me. This is a fine example of stalking, as defined in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, specifically Section 2A (3)(a)
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/section/2A
As there was violence involved in this particular “course of conduct”, it is now the first course of conduct that fulfils the requirements for “Stalking involving fear of violence or serious alarm or distress“
As can be seen to the right, Ms Morgan has tried contacting the Boys Club.
She is clearly not a “boy” and has no idea what they do, so she has no real business contacting them…
…. unless she wishes to try and damage my reputation.
Ms Morgan can be heard saying that she was going to contact “the Boys Club” “in a minute” at time stamp 2:19. of the video on the homepage.
Clearly a deliberate attempt to cause me distress or alarm.
The fact that she did exactly as she threatened is the second required course of action that amounts to “Stalking”.
As can be seen to the right, the unhngedHuman.co.uk domain was recently suspended after someone had made a complaint of “abuse” and “deformation.”
The domain was suspended for 5 days. However, without my intervention, this allegation was independently reviewed, and the outcome is what you see today, the domain has been reinstated. According to the hosting company, “as there was no evidence of abuse or deformation.”
The website is just someone exercising their rights, under the Human Rights Act 1998,
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1/part/I/chapter/9
Specifically, Article 10 titled “Freedom of expression“
However, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, “Offence of stalking,” Section 2A, (3)(f) prohibits “interfering with any property in the possession of a person“
The UnhingedHuman.co.uk domain is my property, and it has been interfered with, making another fully documented example of Stalking
During the visit to my property, PC Bell demonstrated his incredible frustration caused by me, and made two people to suffer a “fear of violence” when he quickly stepped forward towards me, to within striking range and went to grab something off his weapons belt.
This, too, is fully captured on camera, providing irrefutable evidence.
There are two other witnesses to corroborate this.
These police officers were attending after a false complaint of harassment, that has exactly no supporting evidence and an unlawful and biased, faux investigation. This means these officers were unlawfully on my property, intimidating me and trying to serve an illegal penal order on behalf of Ms Morgan.
Their actions were no different to having armed thugs come to my home to scare me off. Incredibly, the police record about this occurrence records “No further action.” I will be establishing how having armed officers attend my home to intimidate me can ever be classed as “No further action…” unless it was done “off the books” and we have more corruption to report.
Making their actions totally unlawful and the defence offered in Section 4 (3) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 cannot be relied on as there was no investigation taking place and no crimes being committed.
This provides the second indisputable course of conduct that leads to the fear of violence.
I’m still collating evidence and preparing my statement, but the law will be enforced. Given the police’s terrible misconduct, which is also documented, I’m sure they will be very eager to provide an outcome I am happy with.
Obviously, this is only the criminal aspect of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.
Section 3 of this act allows for civil remedies.
I shall be waiting for the police to act appropriately and protect innocent members of the public from those who feel they are above the law, just because they use “trigger words” and make false claims, relying on social norms like “men are bad” and “women are the victims of men” to support their malicious allegations.
I have had reputational damage, which I don’t believe can be reversed, so I will be seeking to recover damages when the time is right.