PC Bell and PC Jenman

These two galoots openly admitted that they had investigated alleged harassment.
And yet no one had spoken to me. Making the investigation fall considerably short of the “impartial investigation” required by law and therefore unlawful.

Obviously, any action taken as a result of an unlawful investigation would also be deemed as both unfair and unlawful; these officers were at my door to “warn me.” Sadly, when I asked to give my version of the incident, I was told I could not give it to them, as, according to PC Jenman

“it would be a conflict of interest” …

….. To what should have been an impartial investigation!

PC Bell then proceeded to issue me a penal order, something that only a judge can make, and as it impeded my civil rights, it was unlawful on a second count demonstrating the police over reaching theior authority.

Assault

The officers were very frustrated with me, as I repeatedly exercised my right to express my opinion. 
At one point, PC Bell suddenly stepped forward and dropped his arm from in front of him towards his weapons belt. Both my wife and I feared immediate physical violence.

Harassment actually comes in different forms. I was not aware of this before.

There is “Harassment”, then there is the “Offence of stalking”, a more serious offence than harassment.
Next on the scale of seriousness is “Harassment while putting people in fear of violence” and finally, there is “Stalking involving fear of violence or serious alarm or distress.”

The maximum punishments for these offences vary too. They are respectively:

• 6 months
• 51 weeks
• 10 years
• 10 years

However, for the offence of harassment, or any of its variants, to be a criminal offence, the “course of conduct” needs to occur “on at least two occasions“

I currently have:

• Over 20 instances that amount to harassment. Individually, they may appear insignificant, but as a collective, they demonstrate a very clear course of action that would lead to harassment.
• At least 3 for stalking.
• 2 for “Putting people in fear of violence“, which, when put together with the other instances, makes that conduct qualify for “Stalking involving fear of violence or serious alarm or distress“

Why anyone would risk a 10-year prison sentence just to bully someone who pointed out they had parked inconsiderately? If these charges are confirmed, what would happen to:

• the suspect’s family?
• Their children?
• Their business?

Some people have so much to lose but act as if they are untouchable.

As a very brief demonstration to show that I’m not bluffing, I shall provide a quick overview of the main points.

The video on the home page is a major piece of evidence. At timestamp 0:29, I can be heard saying, “Please leave me alone.“

Obviously, any action that does not “leave me alone” will be a course of action that the perpetrator will know would amount to harassment.

This will be the first occasion of harassment.

At time stamp 0:32, I am assaulted whilst being harassed. This is the first occurrence of “putting people in fear of violence” and caught on video, making it somewhat irrefutable.

At time stamp 2:00, Luci Morgan, of the Luci Morgan Estate Agency, can be seen changing direction to continue following me. By this time, I have already asked Luci Morgan, of the Luci Morgan Estate Agency, to stop following me.

This is a fine example of stalking, as defined in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, specifically Section 2A (3)(a)

As there was violence involved in this particular “course of conduct”, it is now the first course of conduct that fulfils the requirements for “Stalking involving fear of violence or serious alarm or distress“

As can be seen to the right, Ms Morgan tried contacting the Boys Club. She is clearly not a boy and has no idea what they do, so she has no real business contacting them, unless she wishes to try and damage my reputation. Ms Morgan can be heard saying she was going to contact “the Boys Club in a minute” at time stamp 2:19.

Clearly a deliberate attempt to cause me distress or alarm.

The fact that she did as threatened is the second required course of action that amounts to “Stalking”.

As can be seen to the right, the UnhingedHuman.co.uk domain was recently suspended after “someone” had made a complaint of abuse and defamation.
The domain was suspended for 5 days. However, without my interventions, this allegation was independently reviewed, and the outcome is what you see today, the domain has been reinstated as there was no evidence of abuse or deformation. Just someone exercising their right under the Human Rights Act 1998. Specifically, Article 10 titled “Freedom of expression“

However, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, “Offence of stalking” –  Section 2A, (3)(f) prohibits “interfering with any property in the possession of a person”

The UnhingedHuman.co.uk domain is my property, and it has been interfered with, making another example of Stalking

During the visit to my property, PC Bell demonstrated his frustration and caused two people to have a fear of violence as he quickly stepped forward, to within striking range and went to grab something off his weapons belt. This too is fully captured on camera, providing irrefutable evidence, and there are two other witnesses.

These police officers were attending after a false complaint of harassment, that has exactly no supporting evidence and an unlawful and biased faux investigation. This means these officers were unlawfully on my property, intimidating me and trying to serve an illegal penal order. Making their actions totally unlawful, and the defence offered in Section 4 (3) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 cannot be relied on as there was no investigation taking place and no crimes being committed.

This provides the second indisputable course of conduct that leads to the fear of violence.

I’m still collating evidence and preparing my statement, but the law will be enforced, and with the terrible misconduct of the police also documented, I’m sure they will be eager to provide an outcome I am happy with.